Thanks to @jiaxiwu for submitting a merge request to fix the broken workflow examples in the documentation. I am testing the new workflow configs before pushing to production, and the workflow is taking a long time to complete: it has consumed 8 cores for 10 minutes and is still running. Is this expected? Is there a way to make this example run much faster?
The group workflow took a similar length of time to complete. Hopefully we can shorten these because that is too long for someone to wait who is just learning how to construct workflows.
I do see another example already documented in the tutorial jupyter notebook, which takes only about 1 minute and also illustrate the usage and construction of chain workflow. Maybe for new users who run the tutorial successfully, it’s sufficient to learn how to construct them. The examples in the workflow documentation can instead be used only for demonstration purpose.
I just took a look at the merge request and your updated commit and it looks like the problem was that the Chiral EFT parameters were on a dense grid. Your changes seem fine, I usually use:
Just submitted a merge request. This workflow produces meaningful output as proof of concept. The chain and group examples should take about 5 mins each to run. I hope that timing is okay.
I’m still working on ways to speed up the Chiral EFT calculations so hopefully I can push some updates soon to make these examples run faster.